The question arose: Max, with your work on SG the last 2 years has developed a strange situation. Let’s focus on doing on sg Content and participate in editorial affairs, and not collect donuts from Twitch. These are the rules established by the Higher Management.
Max decided that this collision on my part is personal, and he could no longer work with this attitude.
We couldn’t agree.
I am as upset as possible that it all ends like this.
Today, Max Solodilov said in the "dog handlers" that he was leaving with SG.
I did not fire Max. He himself decided that he was leaving.
Initially – with a conversation to Max I came. Therefore, for the balance, for the public I gave him the opportunity to speak out the first. Say what he himself wants and how he wants. He chose such a tone: he retold my words, recalled old grievances and was clearly emotional.
Give me guess how you feel it after his speech. I look like the last paskud. And he is a victim (for some reason) mine extravagance.
I have two options for you to explain everything now:
1. Get dirty linen, talk about backstage in detail, give quotes of malt and other authors. I could only convey to you all the ambiguity of the situation.
2. Or I will write a knowingly weaker text: I will not draw the opinions of other members of the editorial office (they themselves will unsubscribe in the comments, if they want), I will not use quotes from our conversations and correspondence with a malt and will not get old insults. So my position will be much less visual, but the sort will remain in the hut.
I choose the second option. I am a full report that the most important parts of history I will not say now and probably will stay in universal eyes with an asshole. This is the way. 🙁
Max’s departure is complete shit. I didn’t want this and I am not interested in this bit. "Disassembly of flights" falls into the ass and it is not clear whether it will survive it. Good contentmaker leaves the site. Everyone lost. I believe that the departure of Max is my big Glavredsky failure. Another.
How did the Syrbor begin?
The owner of Stopgame has a clear rule: Twitch for SG authors is an additional activity.
This is the law of the site.
And in the head of each author of SG this law is. Because a few years ago we seriously discussed this inside and there was even a small internal streamer crisis. So All The authors are aware of the full report: first content and participation in editorial matters, then streaming on Twitch.
But, here – when summing up the results of the year, we saw that some authors did not really make materials over the year. More or less consciously, violated internal rules. Not that it was not noticed earlier. Just during the year – you can build a dialogue, and according to the results of the year – to summarize clear and transparent conclusions. One of the conclusions: Solod made 5 vidos in 12 months. And only one of them is the author’s project. Last year, his situation was about the same. That is, the main work for Maxim on SG for the last 2 years is streams and "flight analysis".
An important point: with such a conversation, I came not only to malt. Other authors have no problems.
I always enter the position of the author. Maybe something happened or you need to help something? Maybe there are some plans for the future or specifically now a problem creative period? That is, there should be the reason why you have now?
Max did not call his reasons. We could not talk normally.
And what, I just “fired him” like this from the shoulder?
First, I did not fire him. Secondly, approaching the conversation itself was not just. SG authors will be able to confirm: I ran a week and could not understand what to do. I sorted out a variety of options a hundred times, discussed with everyone whether I am right or not. I was very worried about this and was looking for a compromise that would solve the problem optimally and fairly in relation to other authors of the editorial office. Well, you see, it is fair to those who do 30 materials a year.
In short, when I went to the malt – it was anything, but it was definitely not a crazy totalitarian. This is the most difficult situation for all my main credibility in principle. Estimate: dude embarks on the path for which people were fired. At the same time, the dude was already on SG while I walked under the table on foot. At the same time, we founded the heading on Twitch, which collapses. At the same time, he has been conducting a popular “analysis” for many years, while. There are also internal moments that do not make it easier.
OK, what conditions were proposed by malt?
Very simple: for two years you have occupied this situation, but since February, come on without Twitch. Make content on an equal foot.
After that, Rinat, who was even more important than me on this site, was pulled into the dispute, and he directly said to Max: The removal is temporary. Before you cut down again in content. So it’s unpleasant for me to say this, but Solod said a straight lies on the air, exposing this to a pirate capture of “dog handlers” on my part. This is not my only question for his monologue, but I don’t want to climb into it. As he said, said so.
You may have a question: “What *this author *? Or *this author *? Where is the content from them?".
First, SG has a lot of different works. Communication with beginners, activity on plankers, assistance in current issues on special projects, and so on. And when I say “content”, I mean that Max has no other, hidden tasks.
Secondly, I will return to the thesis above: the authors can confirm that there is no tyranny, and you can always find a compromise. The rules are flexible, if there is a dialogue, reasons, requests and agreements.
I will repeat a very important point: according to the content results of the year, not only malt is pushed away from Twitch. Other authors have no problems with this, everyone accepted it okay.
-Let’s make content you make.
-I’m leaving with sg.
It turns out I squeezed Solod from the site? Slot? Created impossible conditions?
No. In the dry residue,
Max Thesis: Twitch temporary removal is an unfair targeted attack personally on it personally.
My thesis: These are the rules of the site addressed from the leadership to several authors. And the leadership confirmed by Max personally.
The situation seems to Max is so unfair that now personal indirectness from me prevents him from staying with the site at least in some form. Personal hostility towards me is higher than attachment to the “flight analysis” or sg in principle.
That is, for example, the option "I found another job, but I will still do something for SG sometimes, because I love the project"-for Max is not an option. “I love analysis and nothing prevents him from devoting him to 3 days a month,” – Max is not close.
You think I like it at least for a fraction of seconds?
The most disgusting: I took it and "took" dog handlers for myself?
No. You saw: I left the "dog handlers" myself, and certainly would not return to such a makar. Returning in this context is tin. I also understand how it looks from the side.
Why do I take the place of Max in the dog handlers?
So, we made a roar of the year mrvegascasino.co.uk and decided that several authors were blocked by Twitch. Among other things, "dog handlers" are falling because of this. Under the blow are Vasya and Flynn, in general in the situation are not guilty.
Question: What to do? We tried to understand how to save the heading without Max. Whom to put the third host?
We went through all possible options and came to the conclusion that either I will be or "dog handlers" can be closed. This was not my decision, it was a decision of the co -hosts.
This is the most dumb shit in the whole situation for me personally, but we did not find another option.
Once again, everything is the same briefly:
SG is a content site. And here we are trying to participate in the movements of each other with all our strength, picking up when we need, focus on the most steep rollers and, including something for you to strive.
During the annual recap, it was summed up that there is a contradictory situation. We discussed it for a long time in different circles. We decided that it was necessary to give a month to come to yourself, and then remove Twitch so that the Solod will return to us again as the author of the video.
Max considered that the claims put forward to him are so offensive that this is an occasion to quit everything.
I did not raise any dismissal or proposed, no critical conditions were created. This is a completely Max solution. He simply said: "Ok, no Twitcha – I went". And he gave his monologue not even to me, but immediately on the air.
I feel a tremendous loss, I could not think that the outcome would be like that.
I left the brackets of many additional nuances of this story and tried to be as objective as possible in some framework that Solod himself set by his monologue himself. I was surprised at a lot, a lot that he said on the air. But I don’t want to turn it into "let them say" now.
I apologize for what happened.
The best comments
No one just found Kulakova just.
Crap. I’m not going to blame anyone personally, I am just as sad as possible from the departure of Solod, from the fact that you could not come to a compromise. We will miss Max, I have no complaints about Dima, if we believe the read.
Could be reduced to:
Kulakov said he was not working
I just have no censorship words to express what I think in this situation. The analysis of flights is just the section because of which I came to SG and which I was looking forward to every month. Without malt, you can immediately bury it.
I can share the inside: to make the SG again with lamp, as it was in the zero, it is decided to return the unanimous decision and make the editor -in -chief of Kirill Oreshkin!
And again advertise the services of courtesans.
I didn’t think that jokes about closing would go so far.
Max sincerely all the best!
Two weeks have passed. the refanda cannot be done anymore
I exhaled and I can say in essence, I could have nodded to smart words, but only … Before the New Year, I did a small series of polls in Twich’s chat and, so it turned out, for them came to rummage and recount all the materials in a year. I really did not think that it would come in handy for such purposes, but what happened came out. 12 RP (not content? Is it true? Vidos with a million views that brought the lion’s part of the people), a video about Nokia, “evil comments”, reviews (one of which was called the best for a year), prevailing (one of which was called the best for a year) … I can do without comparing numbers with others (and not, I’m not about Daur). And how long has the SG is not chasing quality, but by the collision? As for dog handlers … It is strange when this is not considered work, especially considering how much the rubric brings. And when you look at all the broadcasts, that is, the opportunity to compare.
Bottom line … A strange feeling of misunderstanding of what is happening.
"He and I and me". Were. Eight years. And thanks every time.
I am waiting for the vidos "Explain the iceberg Stopheim"
Daur has other tasks for SG, he oversees beginners and works a lot. And, as I mentioned in the text, the exactly the same conversation was with other authors. Guess if there was a down.
I have been on SG since 2010 and this situation for the first time forced me to read all the comments under the blog and even try to leave a meaningful (no) comment under it.
Reading the comments from above, I have a number of questions, most likely to which the answer will not be given, but I will leave them here anyway:
1) “But Daur did not arise”, “But Vasya and RP and dog handlers, but he does something else”.
How do you compare it even if even in the blog itself it is written that the approach to each is individual? How do you compare it if they have different salary that depend on the number and the quality of the content? Twich was taken away from the same Daur, but Solod took a place in the heading, which, without it, was supposed to continue. According to Solod, there were even claims to him about the quality of the RP, and this is also part of his work, and not just extracurricular activities. And instead they offered to engage in abstract content, so that later in the future they would return their place in the dog handlers (which would continue without it). And as a result, it turns out that Daur instead of streams (optional) will go to engage in the finals (planned content), and the malt must engage in abstract content, silently observing how Kungur took his place in the dog handlers. How the malt should feel which the malt in fact was thrown out of dog handlers, and at the same time hinted that he was no longer a cake in the RP, I xs.
2) “oh yes, RP is not content, they just play the game, they say, and they don’t even mount themselves”
And what do you think then content? It always seemed to me that RP has always been a program about how two people play the controversial game, and then they talk about their feelings. Then why do you reproach the program for her idea? It turns out you and the program does not like, but then where big views come from? And whether the RP will become content if Max himself becomes mounted?
3) "Yes, I would just take it and start to make content, he is generally the author on the site is listed"
Why did everyone suddenly forget about the words "SG is a creative team"? Why suddenly on SG the title of the author immediately became an indicator that you should make 1000+ videos a year, while copyright? And why suddenly Solod became known for making copyright videos and then he suddenly decided to score and sit only on dog lines and RP? Many say that he was supposed to start making a heading about famous people in Gamdev, but Common, you all liked the story of a series of mass effects? Or maybe the story of the Yakuza series of your shock from the number of information in it? And in general, is it possible to count the reviews on SG author’s content?
4) "Well, they talked to everyone, only Solod was offended and decided to leave"
It turns out that you would have stayed where you were expressed in the face that you work too easily, took the heading from you, hinted that you are already so -so, deprived of a tangible part of the income and to return it to make it do an abstract something that, after the words about your activity about your activity at the moment, may not like it? At the same time, you were never particularly famous for the activities for which you were reported, and you were not even given any clear boundaries under which you will be returned to your heading and stop looking at you as a loafer. Great conditions, true?
As a result: Solod was reported for what he was never famous for, namely copyright videos. Kicked out of dog handlers, which are a tangible part of the content of SG. Instead, the person who kicked him out (after all, no one can talk more about the movie, true?). Having cut off his income strongly (we must not forget that Solod also lives in a country where he needs to be transferred to the local currency), they forced to do something that should return it to the heading (after all, we all know that hunger is an excellent motivator), how much this is done is generally incomprehensible. And after all this, he must think clearly and saw the videos with a smile? We saw the result yesterday on Stream – Solod said about leaving.Of course I understand that Twich is not the main activity of the site, and the authors should not sit and stream to the detriment of YouTube. And it is clear that RP is not a lot of hourly analysis of the MGSA series or analysis of fear in Siren. But haven’t you reviewed the RP 100 times, and don’t fall asleep under it? Have you never reviewed old Cry of Fear or Degrad streams with strata orders to the round? And how do you like the marathon of the god of war on maximum complexity from Max? Content, content, but if I do not see the author outside the video recorded according to the scenario, what can I say about the author himself? We learned a lot about the authors from the streams and a lot of memes have appeared from them, but now we are taking Twich, so familiar people are removed from there. I hope that from this you can catch some thoughts (please do not hit for grammar)
Definitely – the main failure. Max – strength, we are with you!
Eh. I have not written for a long time. But here it will seem to have.
Dima, in this whole situation, you failed as the editor -in -chief 3 times!
1 failure. – You raised the topic of Maxim’s productivity, on the site, with Maxim himself and with colleagues. You apparently forgot, I doubt that I did not know what branding is.
Just in case:
Branding is the consolidation of the image of your product or service in the minds of consumers, the creation of your goods associations with certain emotions from potential buyers.
Anyone who looks at SG, on YouTube, goes to the site and comes to streams, deeply purple for the amount of content from Maxim. That is, I always want more, but the main thing is that it is. ANY! Since Solod is a brand SG.
You forgot about it.
It’s all exactly that Kulakova is fired. He generally does not do anything on the site, but the very fact that he is attributed to him, holds the audience. At least at the level of memes and gig.
2 failure. – since he raised the issue of productivity. You could not convey to Maxim your thoughts on this problem. In the form after which we would not hear on Stream from Maxim what we heard. And I could not understand what the problem has the problem.
All your words that you ran, persuaded, discussed with someone, they don’t play any role at all. The result is what is important. And he is a failure. And yes, your discussions and persuasion lead to.
3 failure. This is this topic. You write about what you had 2 options. Take out a sort, or not to take out.
This is what you say, I am Dartanyan, but malt … not a good person. There is evidence, but I will not show them.
Thus, it seems like you try to bring the grain of doubts into the words of Maxim, but in fact everyone who reads will decide that it is you … not a good person. You know, said a, say b. But screaming that he is not like that, but I am like this, it doesn’t work. Now you are Dima, not like.
Since as a result people did not see your evidence. Max is not needed. He has clearly – there is no tweich, there is no "analysis of flights". You have a different situation.
1) forgot about the brand.
2) could not find out the reason and could not convey his thoughts.
3) carried out the cord from the hut, without specifying the specifics. Putting himself to Dartaganyan to the people. De, spin to me, Max bad.
And Nitsy and Karamyshev had long told why they left:
Misha left for the development of his channel
Denis also left for the sake of his channel + after he himself decided to tie up with the difficulties of the translation, he essentially only made infects and he was tired of it
To install a minimum content does not work. We went through this when the last time we got into this problem. Hastily made videos appear to observe the quota. Or: what if the author does for a long time, but cool? And what if he does not do so much, but always undermines for the sake of a common cause in any difficult situation and helps everyone?
It is impossible to somehow calculate and legitimize in quotas.
RP – content, yes. But in its pure form there is not much work specifically for the authors. A good example is Vasya, who has both dog handlers and RP. And 3 more videos a month, and many copyright projects.
I understand that each author has his own productivity and his own resource. And therefore, we begin to discuss further on an individual basis. There was no discussion here.
The solution is complex and unpleasant, but true.
Here is my opinion from my branch. Parling of flights – very lazy content. The only difficulty in it is installation. Which, as I remember, makes maestro.
Broadcast on a huge audience without investing in its retention and/or expansion is not beneficial to the channel in the first place. Yes, Max came up with dog handlers, I don’t know, I don’t know – but he decided to develop them on the SG channel, so I see no problems with the fact that SG himself disputes this section.
Those who watched dog handlers or sg because of Max will go to the possible future personal channel of Max, in this case, it will be nice to tell about him in the same dog handlers.
Kungur in my eyes did not sink below)
Hmm, I’m sorry. I thought for old men made content, got mani, did not make content, did not receive mani and everything. The old man (Maxim) is working out on Twich, well, let him engage in current with a twitch, and then you need to fulfill the plan on the site.
The blog kicked my stage of anger through the "bargaining" immediately in "depression". On the site you can’t obscenities, so I just pipe silently.
Where to refund this year? I don’t like him anymore.
